MID-TERM PORTFOLIO REVIEW – ART 141

NAME:

QR/BIOGRAPHICAL STATEMENT CONTINUED

Mounted well; Good print quality; Name included; Readable; Innovative Design

Grade =

DESIGN EXAMPLE & DESIGN EXAMPLE COMMENTARY – 2 PAGES

Mounted well; effort in finding design and writing descriptively about it; good print quality, and thoughtful commentary

GRADE =

CRACKER INTERPRETATION

Understanding of how to use points to create value; careful observation of subject matter (cracker); use of value to create texture and form; scale life size

Grade =

CONCEPTUAL NOTEBOOK 

Conceptually inventive; solid grasp of problem content-the notebook is altered, but still recognizable; evidence of really grappling with idea of assignment; visually compelling-interesting to look at, pulls the viewer in; well crafted; risks; is the critique by someone else there

Grade =

NAME DESIGN 

Balanced and dynamic relationships between positive and negative shapes and between individual modules and groupings of modules; unity and variety; well crafted; inventive and effective use of visual texture

Grade =

TEXTURE LIBRARY

Evidence of exploration

Grade =

WRITTEN CRITIQUES

Thoughtful analysis and commentary on designs based upon assignment criteria

 OVERALL PORTFOLIO PRESENTATION =

ATTENDANCE AND USE OF CLASSTIME; RISK TAKING; CONTRIBUTIONS TO TEAM MEETINGS AND CRITIQUES; PROJECTS COMPLETED ON TIME

ASSIGNMENTS COMPLETE

MID-TERM GRADE =